# The Value of Skipping a Financing Round

A topic that’s been mentioned several times recently is the value of “skipping” a financing round. Generally, the idea is that every time an entrepreneur raises money, their equity is diluted, so “skipping” a round is basically achieving a greater revenue/user/valuation milestone without raising money in the interim.

Let’s look at the math for four hypothetical financing rounds assuming two co-founders each have 50% and ignoring employee equity and option pools:

• Seed Round – Raise \$1 million at a \$3 million pre and sell 25% of the business
Entrepreneurs – Diluted from 50% to 37.5%
• Series A – Raise \$5 million at a \$15 million pre and sell 25% of the business
Entrepreneurs – Diluted from 37.5% to 28.1%
• Series B – Raise \$15 million at a \$45 million pre and sell 25% of the business
Entrepreneurs – Diluted from 28.1% to 21.1%
• Series C – Raise \$50 million at a \$150 million pre and sell 25% of the business
Entrepreneurs – Diluted from 21.1% to 15.8%

As an example, if the entrepreneurs were able to get to the Series C equivalent funding amount and valuation, without having the equivalent Series B in the interim, they’d have each have 21.1% of the company instead of 15.8% — that’s a major difference. More success with less capital invested is always a great formula.

What else? What are some other thoughts on the value of “skipping” a round of funding?

## One thought on “The Value of Skipping a Financing Round”

1. This does make logical sense. However, I am not quite sure how one would balance this out with the mantra “raise money when you can, not when you need”. The risk of skipping the Series B in that example is that circumstances may change and you could need money urgently whilst in the middle of your journey to raising a Series C, but due to your less attractive situation it is then hard to find the investment to survive (let alone expand).

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.