Earlier today Jason Lemkin tweeted that a 50-70% correction is coming to Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) companies:
I agree.
Last week Fred Wilson wrote a post The Bubble Question about it where he attributes overvalued tech stocks to interest rates near zero and the desire for growth companies.
Today, many SaaS companies are trading at 10-12x trailing twelve months revenue, and have no profits. So, why do I think they’re 50% overvalued? Easy. SaaS companies typically spend 40-60% of revenues on sales and marketing to acquire customers (growth is incredibly important). Assuming these sales and marketing costs could be pared back relatively quickly, the theory goes that these companies would quickly achieve 30-40% profit margins.
The average historical price to earnings (PE) ratio is around 15 for a public company. That is, the company is worth roughly 15x profits (right now the average PE ratio is almost 20).
If a public company is worth 15x profits, and a SaaS company can quickly achieve 33% profit margins, that results in the same valuation as 5x revenues (15*.33 = 5). 5x revenues is half of the 10x revenues many SaaS companies are trading at now, thus long term, the valuations should be cut in half.
Of course, this is simplistic in that it isn’t accounting for growth rates, gross margins, renewal rates, total addressable market, premiums for a public company over a private company, etc. But, as an example, if a company is valued based on a function of its future profits, and SaaS companies can become extremely profitable due to the nature of the business model, making a guess as to profit margins results in a straightforward valuation.
What else? What are your thoughts on SaaS company valuations being cut in half?
Leave a comment