Software-as-a-service valuations have been in the doldrums for several years. After the peak hype of 2020–2021 and the COVID-fueled pull-forward of demand followed by the end of the zero-interest-rate era, SaaS valuations have been under consistent pressure.
If you read commentary online and talk with entrepreneurs and investors, three main explanations usually come up.
First, AI investments have sucked much of the oxygen out of the room. On both the entrepreneur side and the corporate buyer side, there is simply less capital available to invest in traditional business productivity software.
Second, valuations for tech companies are still primarily driven by growth rates. With growth rates down dramatically—whether due to increased AI spending, fewer employees (since most SaaS products are priced per seat), or other factors—high valuation multiples are difficult to justify. Without high growth, you are not going to get high multiples.
Third, and possibly the most disruptive argument, is the rise of “vibe coding” and tools like Cursor for developers, and Replit and Lovable for building custom applications through simple prompting. The idea is that companies will increasingly build their own internal software rather than pay $100 per user per month for generic tools, when they can build exactly what they want and customize it as their needs change.
This feels far-fetched once you consider how complicated edge cases and real-world nuance become beyond surface-level CRUD apps. Yet here we are, and these are the arguments being made.
What’s missing from the conversation is another explanation—one that is likely the biggest long-term challenge and is closely related to the third point. While some companies will indeed build their own internal tools, I believe the much larger threat to incumbent SaaS companies is the rise of new SaaS startups created by non-technical subject-matter experts.
As the cost of building software approaches zero and the cost of hosting software on cloud infrastructure enables near-infinite scalability in line with customer growth, the barrier to creating new SaaS companies has never been lower. Instead of paying $20,000 per year to an incumbent vendor, why not pay $2,000 per year to a new SaaS company that delivers 90 percent of the functionality at 10 percent of the cost?
These new companies do not have large customer bases that slow down product development. They do not have immense pressure from existing investors and financial partners. In many cases, everything will be AI-native. The era of a few hundred thousand dollars of recurring revenue per employee may be coming to an end. No technical debt. No outside pressures. Just high-quality, vibe-coded software built by small teams that orchestrate it, and customers who love getting more value for their money.
Entrepreneurs looking for new ideas should lean directly into this. They should find the most unloved SaaS software they can and vibe-code their way into a new entrant in that market, grinding away to create a product customers love that delivers maximum value for minimal cost. It will not be glamorous, but I am confident thousands of entrepreneurs will do exactly this and build strong small businesses.
Incumbent SaaS companies are already under tremendous valuation pressure, and things are only going to get more challenging as a Cambrian explosion of vibe-coded SaaS applications comes online.

