Cost Difference Between Employee and Employer Paid Benefits

One of the common questions I hear is, “Wouldn’t your employees rather have higher pay checks and less benefits?” It’s true that more individual choice is often the better route, and I’m a fan of pushing the decision making down as far as possible. There’s two factors at play here 1) the culture of the company with it’s values and 2) the government’s tax code. Assuming the company places a high value on great benefits, let’s look at how the tax code promotes employer paid benefits.

Take an example benefit of $1,200 per year per employee for housecleaning provided to all employees:

  • Employer paid benefit cost: $1,200
  • Employee paid benefit cost: $1,200
    Plus employee paid federal income taxes (~30%): $514
    Plus employee paid state income taxes (~6%): $77
    Plus employee paid payroll taxes (~6%): $77
    Plus employer paid payroll taxes (~6%): $77
    Total cost for the employee paid benefit including the employer’s taxes: $1,945

So, for the employee to pay for the same $100 per month housecleaning on their own, it costs a total of $1,945 to be paid by the employer to a combination of the government and the employee. For the employer to pay directly for the employee’s housecleaning, it costs $1,200, or 38% less. There’s a serious difference between employee and employer paid costs for benefits.

What else? What are some other thoughts on the cost difference between employee and employer paid benefits?

2 thoughts on “Cost Difference Between Employee and Employer Paid Benefits

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s