Takeaways from The Launch Pad: Inside Y Combinator, Silicon Valley’s Most Exclusive School for Startups

Two months ago I pre-ordered Randall Stross’s new book The Launch Pad: Inside Y Combinator, Silicon Valley’s Most Exclusive School for Startups in anticipation of his storytelling and insight into Y Combinator. Stross wrote one of my favorite books about the dotcom heyday titled eBoys: The First Inside Account of Venture Capitalists at Work, which is a must read for anyone interested in the crazy startup world of the late 1990s. The Launch Pad was a fun, quick read, but didn’t leave me in awe in the way eBoys did. Part of that is likely attributed to my level of understanding of Y Combinator from reading about it and talking with entrepreneurs who have gone through it. Nevertheless, for people that want to get a taste of the Y Combinator experience, the book is required reading.

Here are a few takeaways from the book The Launch Pad:

  • Exclusivity is the norm with an acceptance rate of 3% of the applicants
  • Priority is placed on top flight technical skills
  • Co-founders are more important than the idea (a fair percentage of teams pivot during the 90 day process)
  • Grad school is the most closely related non-startup idea with self-starting and independence being a common theme
  • Alumni, cohort teams, and partners make up the bulk of the experience (not outside mentors like most other accelerator programs)
  • Fundraising is still hard for the majority of the teams in the cohort, beyond the $150,000 convertible debt everyone gets

One message the book did drive home, that I didn’t appreciate before, is how much emphasis is placed on the founders, and not on the ideas. Codecademy was the result of a late-in-the-program pivot, and turned out to be one of the most successful by Demo Day. Y Combinator is a bet on people, knowing that ideas are plentiful.

What else? What are your thoughts on the book The Launch Pad and Y Combinator?

Comments

One response to “Takeaways from The Launch Pad: Inside Y Combinator, Silicon Valley’s Most Exclusive School for Startups”

  1. swagner27 Avatar

    I am halfway through the book. I participate as a mentor in a Techstars affiliate.

    The biggest difference from what I read is that Ycombinator is HUGE on Build it, talk to customers and sell it. Anything else is frowned upon as a waste of time.

    Really “hacking” both the product and the business development on the fly…

    Whereas Techstars from my participation and observation is all about talking to mentors and advisers. Techstars companies have complained to me that topics like: “acquiring customers” is not talked about by many mentors. Market size, legal, scaling etc. is.

    Not necessarily relevant to early stage revenue.

    Some other take-aways:

    Most successful founders built their own stuff. (Dropbox, Heroku, etc)

    More companies have some non-technical founder then I thought.

    YCombinator likes B2B or B2D. The D being developer. B2C is not their focus.

    Single metrics focus like traffic, customers, revenue are stressed early on.

    Many companies have weak concepts and pivot due to lack of knowledge not product failure.

    Super Angels have partners meeting with each company each week (during the 90 sprint) asking about funding the company.

    I think that Ycombinator has a solid culture of pushing founders to focus on building and talking to customers.

Leave a reply to swagner27 Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.