With the ring of a doorbell on Christmas Eve, Clark Griswold (played by Chevy Chase) eagerly rushes to the door in anticipation of his annual company bonus check. Only, after opening the envelope, he quickly reads that there’s no bonus, and, instead he’s receiving an annual supply of jelly. Yes, jelly. Then, to the 10+ family members gathered around, he announces that he’s received a Christmas bonus for 17 straight years and is devastated to not have one.
This scene from National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation captures the number one problem with annual corporate bonuses: people view the bonus as part of their standard compensation and don’t see it as a bonus. If you take away the bonus, it seriously hurts morale. If the bonus is given out, people don’t think anything of it. If you make the bonus tied to individual performance, people naturally game the system to their best interests. If you tie the bonus to company performance, people don’t feel they have much control over it.
Harvard Business Review has an article in their most recent issue titled How Netflix Reinvented HR where the author, Patty McCord, former head of HR at Netflix, talks about corporate bonuses. McCord writes:
During my tenure Netflix didn’t pay performance bonuses, because we believed that they’re unnecessary if you hire the right people. If your employees are fully formed adults who put the company first, an annual bonus won’t make them work harder or smarter.
McCord nails it perfectly. Bonuses don’t do what they’re intended to do and are perpetuated because that’s how it’s always been done.
What’s the solution if you do away with annual bonuses? Pay competitive, market-rate salaries as short-term compensation and include equity or stock options as long-term compensation.
What else? What are your thoughts on the idea that companies shouldn’t do annual bonuses?
Leave a reply to raybelec Cancel reply