# The Value of Skipping a Financing Round

A topic that’s been mentioned several times recently is the value of “skipping” a financing round. Generally, the idea is that every time an entrepreneur raises money, their equity is diluted, so “skipping” a round is basically achieving a greater revenue/user/valuation milestone without raising money in the interim.

Let’s look at the math for four hypothetical financing rounds assuming two co-founders each have 50% and ignoring employee equity and option pools:

• Seed Round – Raise \$1 million at a \$3 million pre and sell 25% of the business
Entrepreneurs – Diluted from 50% to 37.5%
• Series A – Raise \$5 million at a \$15 million pre and sell 25% of the business
Entrepreneurs – Diluted from 37.5% to 28.1%
• Series B – Raise \$15 million at a \$45 million pre and sell 25% of the business
Entrepreneurs – Diluted from 28.1% to 21.1%
• Series C – Raise \$50 million at a \$150 million pre and sell 25% of the business
Entrepreneurs – Diluted from 21.1% to 15.8%

As an example, if the entrepreneurs were able to get to the Series C equivalent funding amount and valuation, without having the equivalent Series B in the interim, they’d have each have 21.1% of the company instead of 15.8% — that’s a major difference. More success with less capital invested is always a great formula.

What else? What are some other thoughts on the value of “skipping” a round of funding?

## One thought on “The Value of Skipping a Financing Round”

1. This does make logical sense. However, I am not quite sure how one would balance this out with the mantra “raise money when you can, not when you need”. The risk of skipping the Series B in that example is that circumstances may change and you could need money urgently whilst in the middle of your journey to raising a Series C, but due to your less attractive situation it is then hard to find the investment to survive (let alone expand).