Tucker Max has a new piece up titled Why I Stopped Angel Investing (And You Should Never Start) outlining some of his theories and lessons learned as a successful angel investor. With so much excitement and exuberance in the tech startup world, especially for angel investing, it’s important to understand some of the counter points.
Here are a few notes from the article against angel investing:
- 2 reasons he stopped angel investing:
- There aren’t enough good people to invest in (and too much money is already chasing bad deals)
- Poor education on going from tested idea to scalable company
- Young and inexperienced founders thinking they know everything
- Angel investing is a poor use of time
- Majority of time should be spent on the best and highest use of skills, with everything else delegated or outsourced
- There aren’t enough good people to invest in (and too much money is already chasing bad deals)
- The biggest thrill in angel investing is that people flatter you and beg for your resources, and that makes you feel powerful and respected
- The entrepreneur is doing the important work, not the investor
- 2 reasons no one should be an angel investor:
- The economics of angel investing work against all but a select few
- The structure of angel investing works against all but a select few
- If you have to be an angel investor, do it as a syndicate on AngelList
I agree that most people should approach angel investing as a way to help entrepreneurs and to stay engaged or learn something new. As a way to make money, most people are better off staying away from direct angel investments and instead syndicating through a successful investor.
What else? What are some other reasons against being an angel investor?
Leave a reply to Anand Thaker Cancel reply