Debate Between Startup Growth and Founder Dilution

One of the more common debates I hear from founders that have hit $1 million in annual recurring revenue is around growing faster by raising money vs the tradeoff of more equity dilution. There’s never a right answer and there’s always a spreadsheet scenario to go either way. At Pardot, we debated this for many years and ended up not raising any money (see the Pardot timeline). Here are a few thoughts on the debate:

Entrepreneurs love to take calculated risks and raising money to grow faster, or taking it slower and owning more of the company, is a continual debate. Regardless, take the time to understand the different options and make an informed decision.

What else? What are some more thoughts on the debate between growing the business faster vs taking more founder dilution?

One thought on “Debate Between Startup Growth and Founder Dilution

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s