More and more companies are buying into the inbound marketing approach of providing fresh, original content on a regular basis to attract visitors to their site. Unfortunately, understanding and believing in the idea doesn’t mean most marketing departments spend the time to make it happen. There exists a need in the market for a company to provide content marketing as a service.
Here are some details around the idea:
- A typical plan might be $1,500/month for one blog post/week, three tweets/week, and one email newsletter per month (based on the blog posts) as well as managing the tools to publish the content
- The price point would be significantly lower than a full-time person in-house to do it
- The price point allows for a marketing manager to put it on his or her credit card without having to get approval from others
- Technology would be used to facilitate the workflow with approval process, coordination of freelance writers, and phone integration so that subject matter experts could talk for a couple minutes about a topic to have that content put into a blog post by a writer
- The project managers and some of the editorial team would be in-house while the writers would be freelancers
- Available up-sells include white papers, video publishing to YouTube, slide publishing to SlideShare, and coordinating webinars
Yes, a PR or marketing agency would be happy to do these things but agencies are typically not set up to get economies of scale with this level of specialization and aren’t good at building proprietary technology.
Inbound marketing works and the market needs content marketing as a service.
What else? What do you think of the idea? Pros and cons?

Leave a comment