A few days ago I was part of a number of discussions around angel / VC investing and supporting local entrepreneurs. One of the recurring themes was between the desire to generate risk-adjusted returns vs investing as a civic duty to help grow the local economy with an understanding that returns might not be strong.
Here are a few ideas on angel / VC investing for returns vs civic duty:
- Generating market-rate returns with angel investing, regardless of scale, is difficult
- One idea is to do a fund of funds where money is invested in angel funds as well as VC funds to diversify the money by spreading it across a much larger number of investments
- Local economies with successful startups benefit from more high paying jobs, diversification of employment base, and wealth creation
- Foundations, which usually can’t invest in startups with their grant making money, can invest their endowments in funds, which could be locally focused
There’s no clear answer as it’s up to the goals of the investor. Regardless, investment returns and civic duty should be allowed parts of the conversation.
What else? What are your thoughts on local angel / VC investing for returns or as civic duty?
Leave a reply to Raymond King Cancel reply