The Valuation Disconnect Between Seed Rounds and A Rounds

There’s a strange phenomenon in the startup world where entrepreneurs work hard to justify a valuation for a pre-revenue seed round based on the team, market dynamics, etc.. In the end, seed round valuations are often in the $1.5 to $3 million range, and there’s little rhyme or reason from one to the next.

Now, that same entrepreneur who was able to raise a $500,000 seed round at a $1.5 million pre-money valuation goes out to raise a Series A round. Only, this time it’s different. This time the investors look at the startup’s metrics. Things like annual recurring revenue, trailing twelve months revenue, daily active users, growth rate, renewal rate, etc. become the main discussion points for valuation.

Say, as an example, the entrepreneur has $1 million in annual recurring revenue with strong growth and renewal rates. For an institutional investor, the valuation would typically be 4-8x run rate. Competitive deals with multiple investors fighting to lead the round ultimately lead to higher valuations. So, that same company 18 months earlier with little-to-no revenue raises money at a $2 million post-money valuation now has a million dollars in recurring revenue and raises $3 million at a pre-money value of $5 million for a post-money valuation of $8 million. While $8 million is dramatically more than the $2 million from 18 months prior, in reality the business is worth many times more than the seed since it has serious revenue and customers, and is much more likely to be successful long term.

There’s a valuation disconnect between seed rounds based on dreams and A rounds based on metrics. As an entrepreneur, it’s important to understand this and understand the psychology of investors.

What else? What are some other thoughts on the valuation disconnect between seed rounds and A rounds?

3 thoughts on “The Valuation Disconnect Between Seed Rounds and A Rounds

  1. After entertaining seeking funding through VCs what are your thoughts on boot-strapping? There are so many downsides to giving up control and potential earnings….in exchange for what? Rapid deployment? Any one have further thoughts on this? Thanks.

  2. Raising seed capital turned out to be 10x more difficult than I ever imagined it would be. Things I found easier than raising seed capital include:

    1. building the product (a B2B SaaS product)
    2. getting customers

    That makes the cost/benefit analysis of trying to raise seed capital much less clear. It never occurred to me that bootstrapping would actually be much easier than raising seed funding.

  3. Definitely had not thought of this before. I have a friend that made the initial seed round but did not get the following round. That was the end for them. They went on quite a bit about the values of boot-strapping afterwards. If being first to market is not essential and you can garner a fair amount of resources I think this is the way to go. What were the unanticipated difficulties involved in raising from the seed round?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.