Category: Leadership

  • Video of the Week: Jack Welch on Creating Candor in the Workplace

    Stanford GSB has a great video up titled Jack Welch: Create Candor in the Workplace. One of my biggest challenges as an entrepreneur was going from being a product-focused inventor to growth-oriented CEO to overall company builder. In addition to reading a ton of entrepreneur books, I’ve read a number of leadership books and tried to incorporate relevant ideas. Jack Welch’s thoughts on the four types of employees has always stuck with me and here, in this week’s video, he talks about the importance of creating candor in the workplace. Enjoy!

    From YouTube: Former chairman of General Electric tells audience to foster honest feedback: “If you reward candor, you’ll get it.”

  • Video of the Week: Patrick Lencioni – The 5 Dysfunctions of a Team

    Patrick Lencioni is one of my favorite authors and I’ve written a number of posts about his books. His most important, and most popular, book is the The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Every entrepreneur must read the book and learn the concepts. In addition to the book, the author has a great video with a number of stories and the key concepts. Enjoy!

    From YouTube: Patrick Lencioni gives a talk at the HTB Leadership Conference 2013 at the Royal Albert Hall, London. His talk covers the five dysfunctions of a team.

  • Transparency in a Startup

    One of the items entrepreneurs frequently debate is the level of transparency to provide within their startup. How much information does a team member need to know? When does not enough information cause problems? While there’s no perfect answer, I’ve found that it’s better to err on the side of providing more information than expected.

    Here are a few areas worth considering as part of the transparency question in a startup:

    • How much cash is in the bank?
    • What’s the monthly burn rate?
    • What are the key metrics for the business and where do things stand?
    • What are the key metrics for each department and where do things stand?
    • What goals need to be hit to raise the next round of financing (if applicable)?
    • What are the top three challenges in the business (some issues, like those that are personnel related, can’t be discussed company-wide)?
    • What’s on the Simplified One Page Strategic Plan?

    Transparency in a startup varies wildly but more entrepreneurs are providing greater levels of transparency and getting greater levels of buy-in as well.

    What else? What are some other transparency questions to consider?

     

  • Make a Good Decision, Learn from It, and Move Forward

    Recently I was talking to a friend and he said he had no interest in being an entrepreneur. Curious, I asked why. There was one simple reason: he didn’t like to make decisions with limited information. As an entrepreneur, so many decisions have to be made with little or no data and lots of gut instinct. For many people, especially perfectionists, making those kinds of decisions over and over is terrifying.

    For me, I like to keep in mind that I’m trying to make a good decision, learn from it, and move forward. Here are a few thoughts on entrepreneurial decision making:

    • Perfect information never exists, never
    • Limited information is normal, and often good enough to make quality decisions
    • Almost all decisions aren’t permanent (thankfully!)
    • Constantly learning and adapting is key to get to the right answer
    • Moving forward is better than standing still

    When the next decision is required on limited information, make the call, learn from it, and move forward. As General Patton said, “A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week.”

    What else? What are some more thoughts on making decisions, learning, and moving forward?

  • 7 Criteria for Effective Feedback

    Buffer has a great post up titled How to Give and Receive Feedback at Work. The idea is that feedback is incredibly important, yet many people don’t give or receive it well. Over the years, I’ve had many feedback related conversations and can attest to its inherent challenges.

    Here are 7 criteria for effective feedback from the post:

    1. The feedback provider is credible in the eyes of the feedback recipient
    2. The feedback provider is trusted by the feedback recipient
    3. The feedback is conveyed with good intentions
    4. The timing and the circumstances of giving the feedback are appropriate
    5. The feedback is given in an interactive manner
    6. The feedback message is clear
    7. The feedback is helpful to recipient

    Head over to How to Give and Receive Feedback at Work and commit to providing and taking better feedback at work.

    What else? What are some other thoughts on feedback?

  • 2 Action Items Going from Doer to Leader

    Last week an entrepreneur emailed me for advice on going from doer to leader. His startup is doing well and now has several employees for the first time. Only, he’s being pulled in many directions and knows he needs to start the slow process of spending a more time on the business and less time in the business.

    I quickly responded that there are two immediate action items to start going from doer to leader:

    So, join a group of other people that are interested in improving their leadership abilities and implement rhythm, data, and priorities to establish a foundation for the business to scale.

    What else? What are some other recommendations for entrepreneurs going from doer to leader?

  • Giving Up Control

    Recently I was talking to an entrepreneur about his journey. Early on in the conversation, I asked one of my favorite questions: what were some of your major milestones and lessons learned? Then, he recounted how one of his more important lessons learned was giving up control of the day-to-day operations so that he could work on the most important and strategic issues. Less tactical involvement turned into more results.

    Thinking back on it, I was an immature micro-manager for the first several years of my entrepreneurial journey. I wanted to control and monitor every piece of the business including every customer support ticket and every line of new code in the product. I didn’t know any other way. The startup was so small and fragile I felt I had to smother it to make it successful.

    Only, once we had achieved some level of success, I wasn’t self-aware enough to change my ways. After hitting a wall with our growth, scalability, and culture, I finally started the journey to unwind from the business and fully empower other team members. It was one of the best decisions I ever made.

    What else? Have you gone through the process of trying to control everything only to realize that giving up control was necessary to get to the next level?

     

  • Holacracy as the Next Startup Corporate Structure

    Ev Williams, the co-founder of Twitter, has a new company called Medium where there are no managers. This idea of a leaderless organization isn’t new but it’s also far from commonplace. Perhaps the best known organization without managers is Valve Software, which published an amazing employee handbook that describes how it works. FRC Review has a new post up where they outline how it works at Medium without managers using this idea of a Holacracy approach to corporate structure.

    Here are some of the key takeaways for Holacracy from the FRC Review article:

    • No people managers. Maximum autonomy.
    • Organic expansion. When a job gets too big, hire another person.
    • Tension resolution. Identify issues people are facing, write them down, and resolve them systematically.
    • Make everything explicit – from vacation policies to decision makers in each area.
    • Distribute decision-making power and discourage consensus seeking.
    • Eliminate all the extraneous factors that worry people so they can focus on work.

    Instead of top-down, command-and-control structure, everything is composed of nested circles. A circle can be one person that owns some aspect of the business or it can be a group of people that own it. If a Holacratic organization sounds familiar, it’s because it’s a blend of two things I’m a big believer in: results only work environments (ROWE) and the value of autonomy, mastery, and purpose. Only, it takes it one step further and gets rid of the concept of a traditional hierarchy and instead makes it so that circles, composed of one or more people, make any and all decisions.

    Holacracy is a great idea and I’m looking forward to watching it evolve.

    What else? What are your thoughts on Holacracy as a corporate structure?

  • Choose the Right Medium for the Communication

    One leadership lesson that took me entirely too long to learn was that different communications require different mediums. The idea is that communication mediums like face-to-face, video chat, phone, and email make it easy to share words but the context and nuance varies wildly. As an example, if people are upset or any sort of miscommunication is going on, face-to-face is significantly better than email or text message.

    Let’s look at some of the different mediums and communication circumstances:

    • Face-to-face – Best for anything emotional (good or bad), alignment-oriented, or difficult
    • Video chat – Not as good as face-to-face but still auditory and visual, especially for staying connected to someone in a different physical location
    • Phone – For exchange and dialogue on a complicated subject as well as times when emotion and relationship are an important part of the equation
    • Email – Simple, fast, and effective for basic information exchange, tasks, and clarification

    Chat and text message are similar to email in that they’re digital but have a greater sense of immediacy and two-way communication about them. Regardless, it’s important to choose the right medium for the communication.

    What else? What are your thoughts on choosing the right medium for the communication?

  • Atlanta Tech Village Mission, Vision, and Core Values

    We’re working on ironing out the Atlanta Tech Village mission, vision, and core values to be a guiding force for the next 20+ years. Each item builds on itself with mission being the next five years, vision the next 20 years, and core values forever. Thinking about the next 20+ years seems strange, but it’s absolutely the right thing to do to make a huge impact.

    Mission

    Be the #1 hub for tech companies and startups in the Southeast

    Vision

    Make Atlanta one of the top 10 tech and startup cities in the country

    Core Values

    • Be nice
    • Dream big
    • Pay it forward
    • Work hard, play hard

    Note: we’re debating between “dream big” and “dream bigger” as one of our core values (more info from Johnson on it).

    What else? What are your thoughts on the Atlanta Tech Village’s mission, vision, and core values?