Blog

  • Investment Sections from Sequoia’s Seed Deal With YouTube

    Miles Grimshaw has a great post up with the original YouTube investment memo from Sequoia partner Roelof Botha to do a seed investment of $1 million on September 2nd, 2005. Google bought YouTube for $1.6 billion a year later.

    Here are the sections from the investment memo:

    • Introduction
    • Deal
    • Competition
    • Hiring Plan
    • Key Risks
    • Recommendation
    • Additional resources
      – Investment summary
      – Competitive analysis
      – Technology overview
      – Team bios
      – Company presentation
      – Company metrics

    Overall, it’s a worthwhile read that’s concise while still covering a number of topics. It’s much like an expanded executive summary without all the detail found in a full business plan. Plus, it includes real operating metrics and data. Entrepreneurs would do well to read the original YouTube investment memo.

    What else? What are some other thoughts on Sequoia’s investment memo on YouTube?

  • 15 First-Time Entrepreneur Misconceptions

    Entrepreneurs are a unique bunch. So much ambition, optimism, and blissful ignorance all wrapped in a desire to change the world. First-time entrepreneurs are especially exciting as they don’t know what they don’t know, making for even more limitless possibilities.

    Here are 15 misconceptions for first-time entrepreneurs:

    1. The destination is more fun than the journey
    2. The initial product idea will be successful
    3. All money is created equal
    4. Things happen fast
    5. Great products sell themselves
    6. If you build it, they will come
    7. Failure to raise money is due to a lack of investors that get it
    8. Culture is one of many items that can be controlled
    9. Timing a market is easy
    10. It’s lonely at the top
    11. Work/life blend isn’t possible
    12. Scaling a business takes the same skills as starting one
    13. No competition is a good thing
    14. Business plans are required
    15. The company with the most funding wins

    Often, you have to experience something first-hand to truly believe it. With time and experience, many of these misconceptions will be dispelled by first-time entrepreneurs.

    What else? What other misconceptions would you add to the list?

  • 5 of the Top 10 Fastest Growing Companies in Atlanta are Tech Firms

    Last week the Atlanta Business Chronicle published a list of the 100 fastest growing companies in Metro Atlanta for 2014. Not surprisingly, half of the top 10 companies are technology firms including three of the top four slots. Tech companies are a shining star in the Atlanta economy and more city leaders are paying attention to the importance of startups and entrepreneurs as job creators.

    Here are the top five fastest growing tech companies in Atlanta:

    • #1 Cloud Sherpas – Migrates Microsoft Exchange to Google Apps as well as consulting for other cloud services
    • #3 Cardlytics – Advertising platform that anonymizes bank data and shows targeted offers
    • #4 Commissions Inc – Real estate brokerage and contact management platform
    • #6 Kabbage – Lending platform for small businesses using alternative data sources to determine creditworthiness
    • #10 CallRail – Phone call tracking, recording, and analytics

    Congratulations to all of the top 100 fastest growing companies, especially the technology ones.

    What else? What are some other thoughts on the fastest growing tech firms in Atlanta?

  • Entrepreneur Slides for Investors

    Over the years I’ve seen hundreds of investor slide decks from entrepreneurs. Some good, some bad, and some all of over the place. When pitching investors, it’s best to keep the visual slides simple (no more than 10 words per slide) and to provide a separate set of leave-behind slides that have more information. Investors want to engage and have a dialogue, so focus on the conversation and not just pitching.

    Now, with an overview on the slides, the next topic is what to include for investors. Larry Cheng, a Managing Partner of Volition Capital, offers up The 10 Slide Company Pitch Deck:

    1. The Problem Statement
    2. How You Solve the Problem
    3. The Customer
    4. The Value to the Customer
    5. Actual Use Cases
    6. The Product
    7. Competitive Position
    8. Financial Overview
    9. Other Key Metrics
    10. Management Team

    Ryan Spoon, a classmate of mine from Duke and now SVP of Digital Products at ESPN, recommends 10-15 slides in his post How to Create an Early Stage Pitch Deck:

    • The Big Idea
    • Why you?
    • The current problem
    • Your solution. Why now?
    • Traction & validation
    • What’s the future?
    • The ask

    Making investor slides should be fun and straightforward. Entrepreneurs love selling the vision and slides help establish the arc of the story.

    What else? What are some other thoughts on entrepreneur slides for investors?

  • Thoughts on Early Talks With a Potential Acquirer

    Over the course of the five-and-a-half years Pardot was in business as a standalone company, we received a half dozen overtures from potential acquirers with differing levels of seriousness. After a startup gains quality market traction, potential acquirers will start sniffing around. Now, most of the inquiries are just to gather information for a corp dev spreadsheet, but occasionally there’s more to it.

    Here are a few thoughts on early talks with a potential acquirer:

    • Remember that there’s little chance a deal will happen, so try and keep the expectations low (don’t start dreaming of a big pay day as it’s very distracting)
    • Use the interaction with a potential acquirer as a learning experience
    • Even if you don’t want to sell the business, it’s a useful exercise to learn what acquirers look for in a startup
    • Continue to grow the business and don’t lose sight of building a great company
    • Mutual NDAs are standard but sharing detailed information isn’t a requirement
    • External validation from a potential acquirer helps boost the confidence of the entrepreneurs

    The biggest takeaway is that each talk with a potential acquirer should be a learning experience with minimal expectations. Potential acquirers will come out of nowhere and disappear back where they came just as quickly.

    What else? What are some other thoughts on early talks with a potential acquirer?

  • The Hard Thing About Hard Things

    Recently I read Ben Horowitz’s book The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy Answers. I enjoy entrepreneurial success story books that are full of anecdotes, and this one is good. Most of the book is CEO/founder advice with 80% of it being solid and 20% not so valuable.

    Ben’s story of Loudcloud/Opsware is one of the more unusual ones I’ve ever encountered. After starting a cloud computing company in the dot come heyday and going public, he decided he didn’t want to be in the hosting business and pivoted. Pivoting is hard enough when it’s just a couple entrepreneurs and an idea — imagine having the pressures of Wall Street and still moving forward with getting rid of your main business and becoming a software company. The bold move paid off and a few years later they ended up selling the business for $1.6 billion to HP. Ben is the rare entrepreneur that took an idea from inception to unicorn exit.

    Here are a few takeaways from the book:

    • Gather input from all the stakeholders and them make the decision you think is best, even without consensus
    • Prepare for psychological meltdowns as the CEO role can be terribly difficult
    • Hire the best candidate for the job even if other team members object (I don’t agree with this)
    • Not everyone will scale as the company scales, but it’s important to give them a shot
    • When the entrepreneurs and executive team are tired, it’s often a good time to sell the business

    The Hard Thing About Hard Things is an easy read that many entrepreneurs will enjoy. With the success of Ben’s venture firm Andreessen Horowitz, Ben has cemented himself as one of the leading business people of the 21st century.

    What else? What are some other thoughts on Ben Horowitz’s book?

  • Think Big, Start Small

    Entrepreneurs are dreamers. So many ideas and so much potential. Only, coming up with an amazing vision doesn’t translate into results. Entrepreneurs need to think big but start small.

    Here are a few thoughts on starting small:

    Entrepreneurs need to think big and start small.

    What else? What are some other ideas around starting small?

  • Gap Between Prototype and Robust Product

    While assembling a prototype to assess market demand is dramatically cheaper than 10 years old, there’s still a serious gap between minimum viable product and robust product. Software, like any product, can always be improved. Unlike many physical products, the complexity of a software product is not always understood even after a fair amount of usage.

    Here are a few thoughts on the gap between prototype and robust product:

    • All software has bugs, but over time the frequency of new known bugs will decrease (assuming minimal new functionality introduced)
    • Some software is inherently more complicated resulting in more time and effort required to achieve a robust state
    • One gauge to assess product robustness is to get it to the point where there aren’t any known blocker bugs and to have configured 10-25 new customers without any issues (bugs are always going to be present but the severity isn’t always going to be high)
    • Product robustness and product/market fit aren’t correlated as the product can be solid without market fit

    Prototypes aren’t the same as robust products but they are very important. Entrepreneurs need to budget for continued product development and pay attention to issues.

    What else? What are some other thoughts on the gap between prototype and robust product?

  • Calendly For Self-Service Calendar Scheduling

    Atlanta Ventures just partnered with entrepreneur Tope Awotona and made a seed investment in Calendly — a cloud-based service that sits on top of Google Calendar making it super easy to provide self-service scheduling (no more sending several emails back and forth to find a time that works). Calendly has signed up thousands of users over the past few months and is focused on helping professionals save time and increase revenue.

    Here are a few of the main benefits of Calendly:

    • Reduce the friction to setting up a meeting (how many times have you gone back and forth over the phone or email to find a time that works?)
    • Make it easy to cancel or reschedule a meeting (many meetings are changed and Calendly cuts down on the noise)
    • More consistent meeting information and preparation (e.g. you can require certain information be provided as part of scheduling a meeting as well as have different meeting types)
    • Automated integration with other systems like CRM (e.g. when a lead schedules a meeting, put it in Salesforce.com)

    Anyone that schedules meetings on a regular basis (e.g. sales reps, customer success managers, support reps, etc) would do well to put a Calendly link in their email signature and make it easy for prospects and clients to schedule a meeting. We’re big fans of Calendly and are looking forward to working with Tope.

    What else? What are some other thoughts on Calendly and self-service calendar scheduling apps?

  • Hot or Not for Startup Potential Customer Matchmaking With Big Companies

    One of the biggest opportunities I see for the Atlanta startup community, and many other startup communities around the country, is helping connect local startups with local mid-to-large companies looking for certain technologies. Big companies are difficult to navigate, have many competing interests, and are not oriented to purchase from startups. With that said, big companies do want to be more innovative and want to try new things but don’t know where to begin or how to engage local startups.

    Here’s an idea for a hot or not service to connect startups with potential big companies:

    • Similar to the site James Hong launched in 2000 (history), the idea is to have startups and big companies list their information in a database with some data being public and some being private
    • Startups filter and browse the big companies giving a thumbs up or down depending on if they are a good fit (hot) or not
    • Big companies filter and browse the startups giving a thumbs up or down depending on if they are a good fit or not
    • When a match is made (both parties give a thumbs up), the software does an email introduction and let’s the startup and big company take it from there

    Some of the key aspects of this include startups agreeing not to hassle big companies that get introduced, big companies agreeing to spend a modest amount of time using the system (will need some C-level buy-in from people that want to help the local community), and a constant curation of information by someone that manages the system (e.g. the local chamber of commerce). Connecting startups with mid-to-large companies is a big opportunity to help grow the local entrepreneurial community

    What else? What are some thoughts on this hot or not system to connect startups with large companies?