Category: Operations

  • The Real Estate Equation for Fast Growing Startups

    Bangalore Properties - Real Estate India - Vas...

    Real estate is tough for startups. There’s the unpredictability with where you’ll be in 24-36 months combined with one of the last remaining old boys network (at least in Atlanta). The best thing for startups to do is go the sublease route. Unfortunately, with the sagging commercial real estate market many of the subleases have dried up as companies that went out of business turned their space back over to the landlord and the macro economy has been soft for several years now resulting in enough time for many subleases to be rented by tenants.

    Subleases are most plentiful right after the economy turns downward and companies put excess inventory on the market. When things are starting to pick up, even so slightly like now, companies hold on to excess space longer in the event things do continue to improve and the space is needed. Fast growing startups have an even bigger challenge because they are hiring people so quickly they need an even larger amount of unused space on hand to accommodate the growth. There’s no easy equation.

    The best thing to do, absent a sublease, is to look for flexible landlords and build into the contract things like an option to break the lease early if you out grow it, right of first refusal on adjacent spaces, and flexibility to move into other spaces in the same complex without penalty. Yes, flexibility is the most important consideration for direct deals.

    What else? What other thoughts do you have on real estate for fast growing startups?

  • Business Idea: SaaS Line of Credit Provider

    The lens of a compact disc drive and its assoc...
    Image via Wikipedia

    There’s a void in the market for high gross margin recurring revenue businesses to get a line of credit based on the recurring revenue. Banks are designed to lend money when you don’t need it (e.g. very profitable) or when you have assets to put up as collateral (a friend of mine got an SBA-backed bank loan for $1.2M to buy some franchises and had to put up $800k of personal money into a CD that the bank held until the loan was repaid).

    The most common assets for collateral are accounts receivables, real estate, and heavy equipment. Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) companies shouldn’t have any of those. Accounts receivables, especially if the majority of customers pay by credit card, are almost non-existent as the customer payment is made on a regular, timely basis (e.g. monthly). A SaaS startup’s appetite for capital is even more acute due to the fact that the “services” part of SaaS results in effectively leasing the product over the life of customer, as opposed to receiving a lump-sum of money up-front like with enterprise software. This clearly impacts cash flow and is made more difficult due to the cost of sales commissions and providing on-boarding and training services. SaaS companies are doing well if after 12 months of having a client they break even. Typically, it isn’t until years two and three that they start turning a profit.

    The business idea is a technology fund that provides lines of credit to SaaS companies. Here are some details:

    • The amount of capital is dependent on several factors including: monies received from recurring revenue in the past 90 days, gross margin, customer renewal rate, customer contract length (if any), and more
    • The fund has a core amount of capital that is then leveraged up with a third-party loan
    • Members of the fund’s management team must have technology experience and be willing to take over a SaaS company that doesn’t meet its obligations (the SaaS companies are using their business as collateral)
    • The idea is riding two waves: lack of sophistication from traditional banks to lend against recurring revenue without hard assets and the proliferation of small SaaS companies that aren’t venture backed

    There’s a clear opportunity in the market for a business like this and I hope entrepreneurs step in and fill the void.

    What else? What do you think of the idea?

  • Updated Quarterly Check-ins

    IMG_1878
    Image by Jose and Roxanne via Flickr

    We’re mixing things up this quarter and doing quarterly check-ins instead of quarterly performance reviews. OK, so they are pretty much the same thing but we tweaked the naming to reflect that this is a conversation with your manager/direct report, it isn’t tied to an immediate raise/promotion, and is important for aligning goals. I’ve talked about performance reviews several times before. Here are the questions we ask now:

    1. What did you accomplish this quarter? (List top 5-10 accomplishments)
    2. What 3-5 goals will you focus on next quarter?
    3. How can you improve?
    4. How are you embracing the company values? (Please provide specific examples.)

    The quarterly check-ins are frequent enough to remember what you accomplished and infrequent enough to not be burdensome. My recommendation is to do something similar to facilitate communication and feedback on a regular basis.

    What else? What other ideas do you have about check-ins/performance reviews?

  • LCD Scoreboard Sets the Tone

    Lenox Square.
    Image via Wikipedia

    When people come to our office their first comment is always about the great views from the 34th floor on the edge of North Buckhead. Their second comment is almost always about the large LCD scoreboard we have in the lobby. People aren’t used to seeing a company’s current results(including revenues) and goals for the quarter prominently displayed for everyone to see. The LCD scoreboard sets the tone: results matter and we’re transparent about our progress.

    Here are some benefits of the LCD scoreboard setting the tone:

    • Everyone knows exactly where we stand on a daily basis via the LCD scoreboard in the lobby and the same Google Spreadsheet on the homepage of our intranet
    • We believe in transparency and accountability the moment you walk in the door
    • When things are going well, or not well, peer congratulations or peer pressure reinforce that everyone’s in it together

    The LCD scoreboard seemed like overkill when we first did it because of the cost and effort but I can confidently say it was easily worth it.

    What else? What are your thoughts on using tools like an LCD scoreboard to set the tone?

  • Loosening the Purse Strings for Growth

    The unibody MacBook with cover closed (before ...
    Image via Wikipedia

    One of the phenomenons we encountered a year ago was money coming in faster than we had budgeted for in a significant way. Now, yes, it is a high class problem to have and it’s easy to think that that would make for some nice short term profits. Well, we’re focused on growing and building a large business in a small, fast growing market with strong competitors. The interesting thing is that we’re scrappy as part of our company culture but with this market opportunity we had to loosen the purse strings for growth.

    Here’s what we did as a result of growing faster than expected:

    • Increased our marketing budget substantially
    • Started working with recruiters to find additional team members as we’d tapped our existing team for referrals (half our employees come from referrals and we do a $1,000 employee referral bonus)
    • Bought MacBooks and giant monitors for everyone
    • Added catered Flying Biscuit breakfast every Monday morning

    Could we have saved some money and gotten by in a cheaper manner? Yes. Did we feel like with our size and scale we could afford to experiment more and enjoy some of life’s niceties a bit more? Yes. There’s no right or wrong answer but we felt that loosening our purse strings for growth was a great move and we’re already seeing results.

    What else? What changes have you made as your business has grown?

  • Revisit KPIs at Least Quarterly

    An apartment building in the Auckland CBD in A...
    Image via Wikipedia

    Key performance indicators (KPIs) have been discussed several times before (here, here, and here). In general, we do two KPIs per department and discuss them at our weekly tactical if a value is out of line. There’s always the tendency to try and complicate things by adding one, two, or three more per department but I’ve found that it is hard enough to concentrate on a couple things let alone five different items multiplied out by several departments (sales, marketing, services, support, operations, and engineering).

    One thing to note is that KPIs should be revisited at least quarterly for both the goals for that quarter as well as the items being measured. I’ve found that we usually change one KPI completely each quarter to try a new metric to see if better represents one of the two most important numbers for a department. Most individual KPI goals change each quarter in an upward manner but some stay pretty steady (e.g. engineering average of 32 burn down hours per week per developer).

    My recommendation is to keep KPIs simple and to revisit them at least quarterly. KPIs should be fluid metrics that are constantly improving, but not complicated.

    What else? What other tips do you have about revisiting KPIs?

  • Bottom-Up or Top-Down Financial Projections

    Continuing the post from earlier in the week titled Startup Financial Models after Product/Market Fit, I wanted to talk a bit more about financial projections. Too often an entrepreneur asks for feedback on their executive summary, slide deck, and financial model only to have the financial model show a top-down projection. A bottom-up projection is a much better way to do it. Let’s look at a few details:

    • A top-down projection is often something like “we’ll sell $500k the first year, $3 million the second year, and $10 million the third year” without detailing what it takes to actually achieve those results
    • A bottom-up projection details the tactical items like number of sales reps, sales rep quota, hiring plan, percent of sales reps that won’t work out, ramp up times for sales reps, ad spend per rep or per new client, etc
    • A bottom-up projection more accurately outlines the assumptions and thought process of the entrepreneur, which then allows advisors or investors to offer more valuable feedback
    • A bottom-up projection helps the entrepreneur better budget for the startup and it often shows it’s more expensive than expected to reach the goals

    My recommendation is to do bottom-up financial projections to better understand the business and what it takes to be successful.

    What else? What other ideas do you have about financial projections?

  • Startup Financial Models after Product/Market Fit

    This is a flow plan of an inefficient financia...
    Image via Wikipedia

    The last thing many technology entrepreneurs want to do is to become spreadsheet jockeys but once product/market fit has been achieved one of the next things to do is to develop a comprehensive financial model. Yes, before product/market fit you need to have a good idea if the business is potentially viable, and some spreadsheet work is necessary to understand the business economics, but this should be a simple exercise. Post product/market fit the financial model should be much more detailed.

    Here are some resources to help build and think through a financial model:

    Ideally there would be example financial models online that could be easily customized but the nature of most startups is that there are company-specific nuances requiring heavy customization. My recommendation is to familiarize yourself with as much as you can related to financial modeling while enlisting help when possible.

    What else? Do you have any tips or examples for startup financial models?

  • SaaS Startup Growth Metrics

    Kirche Saas 6
    Image via Wikipedia

    Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) continues to be a hot area for startups. The Responsys IPO filing shed more light on the numbers behind a larger scale SaaS business, including ratios of license to service revenue as well as growth over many years. As a SaaS company, whereby clients essentially rent the software, and thus are financed compared to paying a large up-front license fee, it is critical to understand if you’ll be making money over a long-term horizon as there’s a great chance you’ll lose money in the short-term due to the nature of the business.

    Here are some SaaS growth metrics we track:

    • Churn rate in terms of number of clients as well as in dollars
    • Monthly, quarterly, and annual recurring revenue growth
    • Client acquisition costs as well as how many months/years it takes for a client to be profitable
    • Omniture Magic Number – ratio of sales and marketing costs two quarters ago to new annual recurring revenue from last quarter
    • Average revenue per customer/user
    • Lifetime value of the customer as well as the lifetime value discounted against the cost of capital
    • Cost of goods sold (typically hosting and customer service fees) per client

    Managing and tracking these SaaS metrics help us better understand our company as well as benchmark us against data from publicly traded SaaS companies. My recommendation is to prepare a monthly analysis of this type of information.

    What else? What other SaaS startup growth metrics do you track?

  • What B2B web apps do you use?

    DSC_7174
    Image by Harold of the Rocks via Flickr

    Two weeks ago I was talking to an entrepreneur about the proliferation of B2B web apps. He asked me what tools we use, and after thinking about it, I realized we have quite a few different systems in use. Here’s most of what we have:

    Yes, there are some categories with multiple systems in there due to different teams using different products. The growth of quality, affordable web apps continues to amaze me and I look forward to adding more systems in the future.

    What else? What are some other apps you like related or unrelated to the ones listed above?