Blog

  • The Elusive Product / Market Fit

    Product / market fit is much more difficult than it sounds. On the surface, the idea seems straightforward: build and refine a product that meets the needs of a market. Only, when in the arena battling to find success, it becomes readily apparent that finding product / market fit is a challenging grind (see 5 ways to identify product / market fit).

    Here are a few thoughts on the elusive product / market fit:

    Finding product / market fit is a process that often takes 1-2 years. And, because it takes so long, there’s an extended period of time with little revenue, so it’s important to plan for a marathon and not a sprint.

    What else? What are some other thoughts on the elusive product / market fit?

  • Metrics Tracking Based on Startup Scale

    Startups, on average, don’t track enough relevant metrics on a regular basis. Some engineering-led startups are very analytical and track so many metrics that it’s difficult to know what’s important. Overall, it’s important to align quantity of metrics with the scale of the startup.

    Here are a few ideas on metrics tracking based on startup scale:

    • Always measure cash on hand and cash burn (if applicable), regardless of scale
    • Based on the four stages of a startup, increase the number of metrics tracked at each stage
    • Operational metrics become much more important once product / market fit has been achieved (see assessing fit) and the focus turns to building a repeatable customer acquisition machine
    • Managers and department heads should have 2-3 main metrics shared with the whole company and many more tracked internally (so, as you add managers, add metrics)

    Here’s an example set of metrics to track on a weekly or monthly basis after product / market fit:

    Overall

    • Annual recurring revenue
    • Cash on hand (or months of runway)

    Sales

    • New annual recurring revenue (ARR)
    • 30-day weighted pipeline

    Marketing

    • Marketing qualified leads (MQLs)
    • MQL opportunity value

    Support

    • New tickets
    • Closed tickets

    Product

    • Net promoter score
    • Net churn ARR

    Engineering

    • Sprint completion %
    • New bugs

    As a startup grows and matures, so should the number of metrics tracked.

    What else? What are some other thoughts on metrics tracking based on startup scale?

  • Double Inside Sales Rep Productivity in a Week

    Two of the hardest positions to fill are inside sales reps and software engineers. So, when an entrepreneur comes to me and says they want to expand their sales team, I first want to find out if they are doing everything possible to maximize existing productivity. More often than not, they are using a modern CRM, like Salesforce.com, but aren’t taking advantage of so many other good sales tools.

    Here are tools to double inside sales rep productivity in a week (disclosure: I’m an investor in the last three):

    Sales rep productivity is a function of data, technology, processes, and, of course, time. Double the productivity by taking advantage of technology to make the reps’ time twice as useful.

    What else? What are some other ways to improve the productivity of inside sales reps?

  • Building a Passionate Community is Different Than Inbound Marketing

    Recently I was talking with an entrepreneur who has been implementing inbound marketing best practices for years but not getting much value. His startup is past the product / market fit stage and now he’s working on building a repeatable customer acquisition machine and needs to fill the top of the marketing funnel (see Lead Generation Drives SaaS Startups). On the inbound marketing front, he’s been writing blog posts, creating white papers, nurturing followers on Twitter, and following search engine optimization recommendations.

    After thinking about it for a minute, I commented that implementing inbound marketing best practices is different from building a passionate community. Here are a few thoughts on it:

    • Standard content, while keyword rich, often isn’t edgy or strongly opinionated
    • Offline interaction and building personal rapport is an important ingredient in cultivating a community
    • Audience engagement is readily measured based on number of comments, retweets, and follow-up emails
    • Amazing storytellers, like the best programmers, are 10x more effective than their colleagues

    So, as part of building a passionate following, think about the cult in culture and figure out what resonates with the people you want engaged. Inbound marketing is about relevant content while a passionate community comes from compelling leadership.

    What else? What are some more thoughts on how building a passionate community is different than inbound marketing?

  • Gall’s Law and Startups

    Business of Software has a great video up by Des Traynor, co-founder of Intercom, where he talks about why Product Strategy is About Saying No. A couple minutes into the video, he cites Gall’s Law, which is critical for anyone in the startup field:

    Gall’s Law

    A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.

    A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be made to work. You have to start over, beginning with a working simple system.

    People ask all the time why a big company can’t just throw a ton of money at an idea and knock-off the market leader. Gall’s Law is one of the main reasons.

    What else? What are some other thoughts on Gall’s Law and startups?

  • Cold Calling for Fun and Profit

    Cold calling isn’t dead. In fact, with so many people texting, emailing, and hanging out on social media, cold calling is even more effective because it is so under used. That said, cold calling isn’t easy. In fact, cold calling is very difficult and emotionally draining (for most people). Here are a few thoughts on cold calling:

    • Allocate enough time and resources to be successful (e.g. trying it for a couple hours one afternoon doesn’t qualify as effort – allocate 40 – 80 hours of work to figure out if it’s going to work)
    • Read Aaron Ross’s great book Predictable Revenue and learn how to do modern, internet-augment selling
    • Build great lists of prospects to call on using a tool like the SalesLoft Prospector
    • Pick at least three different job titles and call 500 people with that title (e.g. email marketing manager on LinkedIn)

    Cold calling becomes even more effective with a proven methodology like Sandler Sales Training and other sales rep training programs. So, if cold calling isn’t on your radar, add it.

    What else? What are some other thoughts on cold calling for fun and profit?

  • Insight’s Periodic Table of SaaS Sales Metrics

    Insight Venture Partners has an excellent PDF up titled Insight’s Periodic Table of SaaS Sales Metrics where they break down seven different sales related categories and provide key metrics. This is super impressive as it was built using data from a number of their portfolio companies, so it’s real information from some of the fastest growing Software-as-a-Service companies in the world. Insight has an impressive track record with investments in companies like ExactTarget, AirWatch, and HootSuite.

    Here are the Periodic Table of SaaS Sales Metrics categories with a couple key metrics:

    • Business Development Reps (appointment setters)
      – 2 months new BDR ramp time
      – 10 sales qualified leads per week
    • Inside Sales Reps
      – 3 months new ISR ramp time
      – $630k-$720k annual recurring revenue annual quota
    • Field Sales Reps
      – 6 months new FSR ramp time
      – $800k – $1.3M annual recurring revenue annual quota
    • New Business Bookings
      – 6% average commission on up-sell bookings
      – 66% of companies offer a trial before buying
    • Retention
      – 2% median renewals commission rate
      – 50% of churn is uncontrollable
    • Professional Services
      – 25% is the average professional services fees as percentage of 1st year contract
      – 25% of companies give quota relief for professional services but no commissions
    • Account Managers
      – 60% account managers responsible for up-sell annual recurring revenue
      – 30% – 50% average net promoter score

    Anyone involved in SaaS should study the table and use it to benchmark against their internal numbers.

    What else? What are your thoughts on Insight’s Periodic Table of SaaS Sales Metrics?

  • When to Start Scaling the Sales Team

    Sales and sales teams are one of my favorite topics as I’ve seen the wonders of what an amazing sales leader and sales team can accomplish. According to the Four Stages of a B2B Startup, after achieving product / market fit, it’s time to build a repeatable sales process. Building a repeatable sales process does not mean spending a ton of money on sales and marketing right out of the gate. What it does mean is experimenting with a variety of sales and marketing tactics, including things like 100 Growth Hacks in 100 Days.

    A startup is ready to start scaling the sales team when the following two metrics are in place:

    • Full burdened cost of sales and marketing expenses for a 90 day period of time is equal to or less than new annual recurring added in that same time period (e.g. spend $50k in sales and marketing salaries, commissions, trade shows, PPC ads, etc and generate at least $50k of new annual recurring revenue)
    • Annual recurring revenue generated by a sales rep is at least 3x the fully loaded cost of the sales rep (e.g. if a fully loaded sales rep with salary, commission, and taxes is $80k, the rep should bring in at least $240k in new annual recurring revenue in a calendar year – see The 3x Rule for SaaS Inside Sales Rep Quotas)

    Of course, there are a number of other important factors like gross margin, renewal rates, etc. that are play into these recommendations but this is a good start. Much like Startups Should Resist the VP of Sales Temptation, startups should also hold off scaling the sales team until the appropriate metrics are in place.

    What else? What are your thoughts on when to start scaling the sales team?

  • Colleges Should Offer Two New Courses for Entrepreneurial Students

    Earlier today I was talking to a second-year MBA student at a top 10 business school. As graduation looms on the horizon, he’s looking to network with startups and find a full-time gig in the summer. After the usual discussion about the desired type of gig (building or selling) as well as appetite for risk (seed stage, early stage, growth stage, etc) he posed a question on behalf of his professor: what should colleges be doing to prepare students to be entrepreneurs?

    I thought for a second and offered up that colleges should offer two courses not commonly found:

    • Professional Selling – Nothing gets done until something gets sold. Sales skills are important for entrepreneurs, not just sales people. Beyond the sales challenge of signing the first 10 customers, most entrepreneurs have to sell investors on why they should invest in their idea. Professional selling is an ideal course for entrepreneurs.
    • Lean Startups / Customer Discovery – Business plans are dead. Validating ideas with prospects prior to building a product is alive and well. Dynamic business model canvases are in vogue. Entrepreneurs would do well creating and testing hypothesis, using the scientific method, rather than writing plans based on third-party information found in a vacuum. Doing is better than theorizing.

    Of course, colleges are good for teaching subjects, but they are no substitute for getting out there and starting a real business, even if it’s a simple concept anyone can do. Colleges would do well to offer courses on professional selling and lean startups / customer discovery.

    What else? What are your thoughts on these two course ideas as well as other courses colleges should offer for entrepreneurial students?

  • 947 Different Marketing Technology Companies

    Scott Brinker, a.k.a. Chiefmartec, has an amazing supergraphic up with 947 different marketing technology companies in his post titled Marketing Technology Supergraphic 2014. Just looking at it you get the sense that there are way more tools and technologies out there than anyone would have expected. Only, there are even more as many startups carve out niches and don’t show up on the radar.

    Here are the categories in the supergraphic:

    Marketing Experiences

    • Email Marketing
    • Mobile Marketing
    • Search & Social Ads
    • Display Advertising
    • Video Ads & Marketing
    • Creative & Design
    • Communities & Reviews
    • Social Media Marketing
    • Events & Webinars
    • Calls & Call Centers
    • Customer Experience / VoC
    • Loyalty & Gamification
    • Personalization
    • Testing & Optimization
    • Marketing Apps
    • SEO
    • Content Marketing
    • Sales Enablement

    Marketing Operations

    • Marketing Data
    • Channel / Local Marketing
    • Marketing Resource Management
    • Digital Asset Management
    • Agile & Project Management
    • Marketing Analytics
    • Dashboards
    • Web & Mobile Analytics
    • Business Intelligence

    Middleware

    • Data Management Platforms / Customer Data Platforms
    • Tag Management
    • User Management
    • Cloud Connectors
    • APIs

    Backbone Platforms

    • CRM
    • Marketing Automation
    • Web Site / Web Content Management / Web Experience Management
    • Ecommerce

    The next time an idea pops in your head, check out the supergraphic and use it as a starting point for research.

    What else? What are some thoughts on the different marketing technology company categories and companies listed?